
Book Consultation
984-265-7800
Book Consultation
984-265-7800
Effective handling of fiduciary issues helps deter breaches, preserve corporate value, and ensure accountability within the boardroom. By pursuing derivative claims when warranted, the process can encourage responsible governance and mitigate personal risk for executives who fail to meet their duties.
A comprehensive strategy often results in stronger governance reforms, aligning board practices with regulatory expectations and reducing the likelihood of future breaches that could impact company value and stakeholder trust.

Our team combines practical corporate insight with litigation strategy to address fiduciary disputes efficiently. We prioritize client goals, transparent communication, and cost-effective paths to remedies that safeguard governance and corporate value.
When litigation is necessary, we prepare a robust trial plan, including witness preparation, exhibit strategy, and persuasive arguments designed to achieve favorable outcomes while protecting client interests.
Fiduciary duty is the legal obligation of directors and officers to act in the best interests of the corporation, including duties of care, loyalty, and good faith. In practice, breaches may involve self-dealing, conflicts of interest, or mismanagement that harms shareholders and the company. Understanding these duties helps clients assess potential claims and remedies.
A derivative claim is typically considered when a shareholder believes the corporation has suffered harm due to breaches by fiduciaries. It allows the company to pursue action on its behalf, rather than an individual, and may seek damages or governance reforms. Pre-litigation steps often include internal reviews and demands.
Remedies for fiduciary breaches include monetary damages, restitution, injunctions, and orders to implement governance changes. Depending on the case, settlements can provide timely relief while preserving business operations, whereas court relief may be necessary for more complex disputes or where breaches are ongoing.
Derivative actions in Maryland vary by case, but timelines depend on the complexity, discovery scope, and court schedules. Clients should expect a process that includes early assessments, negotiations, and potential motion practice, with steady progress toward resolution and governance improvements.
Helpful evidence includes board minutes, contracts, financial statements, communications showing conflicts of interest, and internal memos. Meticulous documentation supports claims of breach, damages, and causation, increasing the likelihood of a favorable remedy while preserving privilege where appropriate.
Yes. Some governance issues can be addressed through settlements, structural reforms, and mediation without full litigation. An experienced attorney helps design a plan that preserves operations, protects stakeholders, and achieves governance improvements while minimizing conflict.
Costs vary based on case complexity, duration, and strategy. Clients should budget for initial consultations, discovery, expert fees, and potential court costs. We focus on transparency, regular updates, and options that align with the client’s financial and strategic priorities.
Mediation can be an effective step to resolve fiduciary disputes quickly and with less expense. It offers a controlled environment to negotiate remedies, governance reforms, and future safeguards while preserving business relationships whenever possible.
Before meeting a fiduciary duty attorney, gather corporate documents, board minutes, contracts, and any correspondence related to duties and breaches. A clear summary of concerns, goals, and the desired outcomes helps the attorney tailor a practical, step-by-step plan.
Protecting sensitive information involves privilege protection, careful disclosure, and secure document handling. We guide clients on what to share, how to organize materials, and how to communicate with opposing parties while safeguarding confidential data.
"*" indicates required fields