Well-crafted licensing and distribution contracts create predictable income streams, clarify responsibilities, and limit exposure to disputes or unauthorized use. By defining performance expectations, payment terms, and dispute resolution mechanisms, these agreements help preserve relationships with partners and customers while protecting intellectual property and commercial interests across jurisdictions.
Comprehensive agreements specify who owns what, who performs which obligations, and how disputes are handled. This allocation helps prevent role confusion and provides clear contractual remedies that can be enforced if a counterparty fails to meet contractual commitments, preserving business continuity and commercial relationships.
We focus on business-driven legal advice, translating commercial needs into enforceable contract terms that protect assets and support growth. Our attorneys combine transactional drafting and negotiation skills with litigation awareness to anticipate disputes and craft clauses that minimize downstream risk.
If market conditions or business models change, we draft amendments and negotiate adjustments to the agreement. For disputes, we evaluate negotiation, mediation, or litigation options and recommend approaches that best preserve relationships while protecting contractual and commercial interests.
A licensing agreement grants rights to use intellectual property, such as patents, trademarks, or software, while preserving ownership. It focuses on the permitted uses, sublicensing rights, and compensation for that use. A distribution agreement governs how products are sold, delivered, and marketed by a distributor, defining territory, pricing, and performance obligations. Choosing the appropriate structure depends on your commercial goals: licensing suits monetizing IP with control over use, while distribution addresses physical or digital product movement and reseller responsibilities. Both documents can overlap, and drafting should coordinate terms to avoid unintended transfers of rights or channel conflicts.
Royalty rates are typically based on net sales, unit price, or a flat licensing fee and reflect industry norms, margin structures, and bargaining power. Minimum guarantees provide a baseline payment to secure revenue for the licensor and encourage active promotion by the licensee or distributor. Clear definitions of the royalty base and deductions are critical. Calculations should specify accounting conventions, currency, timing, and audit rights. Parties often negotiate tiers, escalators, or caps tied to sales volumes or milestones, balancing incentives for the distribution partner with predictable returns for the licensor.
Granting exclusive rights to a distributor restricts your ability to sell directly or appoint other distributors in the specified territory or channel. If you anticipate direct sales later, include carve-outs, limited exclusivity by product line or channel, performance benchmarks, and termination triggers for nonperformance to preserve flexibility for future strategies. Drafting clear exclusivity limits, duration, and performance conditions protects your ability to evolve distribution models. Consider geographic or channel exceptions and review termination consequences for inventory and customer relationships to avoid operational disruptions when transitioning sales strategies.
Licensors should require measurable quality control measures including product specifications, approval rights for marketing materials, and inspection or audit mechanisms. These provisions help ensure that distributed products meet agreed standards and protect brand reputation by allowing licensors to approve changes to designs, packaging, or manufacturing processes. Include remedies for persistent noncompliance such as corrective action plans, probationary periods, and termination rights. Clear standards aligned with industry practices reduce disputes and provide objective criteria for enforcement or remediation when quality issues arise.
Protecting your brand with international distributors involves registering trademarks where you sell, specifying permitted uses and translations, and setting quality control and approval processes. Contracts should address customs compliance, labeling requirements, and local regulatory obligations to reduce legal exposure and ensure consistent brand presentation across markets. Include audit rights, defined metrics for acceptable performance, and dispute resolution clauses specifying applicable law and venue. Consider localized legal review to ensure that contract provisions align with host country regulations and commercial customs to avoid enforcement gaps abroad.
To allow audits, include reporting frequency, required documentation, and a right to audit with reasonable notice. Specify the scope of records to be examined, confidentiality protections for business information, and remedies for underreporting including recalculation, interest, and recovery of unpaid amounts. Define the audit process, whether audits are conducted annually or triggered by suspicion, and cost allocation for material discrepancies. Clear audit mechanics deter misreporting and provide a practical path to verifying payments and compliance with royalty or sales obligations.
Termination clauses should identify material breach, insolvency, failure to meet performance benchmarks, and other events that justify ending the agreement. Include cure periods where appropriate and outline post-termination obligations such as inventory disposition, cessation of use of trademarks, and settlement of outstanding payments. Address remedies including injunctive relief and recovery of damages, and create wind-down procedures to protect customers and preserve value. Well-drafted post-termination provisions prevent disputes over remaining inventory, ongoing warranties, and residual rights to continue servicing existing customers.
Insurance and indemnity provisions allocate risk for product liability, intellectual property infringement, and third-party claims. Require distribution partners to maintain insurance appropriate to the product and channel, and include representations that they will comply with laws and safety standards to reduce potential exposure for the licensor or manufacturer. Indemnity clauses should be reciprocal where appropriate and clearly define the scope of covered claims, defense obligations, and limits on liability. These provisions protect balance sheets and provide contractual recourse if negligence or regulatory violations lead to losses.
Yes, distribution agreements can and should address both online and offline sales channels, but they must define channel-specific rights and restrictions. Clarify whether online marketplaces are permitted, set pricing and MAP policies, and allocate responsibilities for returns, taxes, and fulfillment to avoid channel conflict and preserve brand integrity. Consider carve-outs or tiered rights for certain channels, and include enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized channel sales. Clear channel definitions and controls promote harmonious multichannel distribution and reduce disputes over customer segmentation and pricing strategies.
Ensuring compliance across states requires coordination of contract terms with applicable state laws, tax obligations, and regulatory filing requirements. Address choice of law and dispute resolution clauses, and identify which party is responsible for local permits, product registrations, and sales tax collection to prevent regulatory exposure. Conduct targeted due diligence in new jurisdictions and update agreements to allocate compliance duties clearly. Periodic legal reviews help adapt contracts to changing regulatory environments and avoid surprises that could disrupt distribution operations or expose the business to penalties.
Explore our complete range of legal services in The Plains