Now Serving
NC · MD · VA
Properly structured licensing and distribution agreements create revenue opportunities while preserving control over brand and technology. They allocate risk, set performance expectations, and provide remedies for breaches. For companies entering new markets or outsourcing production, these contracts help protect intellectual assets, ensure product quality, and provide predictable financial terms that support long-term planning and investor confidence.
Detailed indemnities, warranty limitations, and termination clauses provide predictable ways to manage breaches and losses, reducing uncertainty about potential exposures. Well-crafted remedies and audit provisions help ensure compliance with payment and reporting obligations and give licensors and distributors practical tools to enforce contract terms when issues arise.
Hatcher Legal focuses on practical legal solutions for businesses at every stage, from startups to established enterprises. The firm emphasizes clear contract language, thoughtful risk allocation, and alignment with client business objectives to help ensure agreements are enforceable, commercially realistic, and supportive of growth strategies.
If disputes arise, we assist in pursuing negotiated resolutions, mediation, or litigation when necessary. We evaluate remedies, pursue injunctive relief for IP misuse, and enforce contractual rights to recover damages or secure compliance, always weighing commercial outcomes against litigation risks and costs.
A licensing agreement grants permission to use intellectual property under specified conditions, while a distribution agreement governs the sale and supply of products through appointed channels. Licensing focuses on rights to technology or brands and may include royalties, maintenance, and improvement ownership, whereas distribution centers on supply obligations, territory, and commercial performance. Choosing the correct contract depends on whether the primary relationship involves transferring use rights to IP or appointing a party to market and sell tangible products. In many cases, agreements overlap and should be coordinated to address IP use, branding, and product distribution together to avoid conflicts and gaps in enforcement.
Royalty structures can vary and often include percentage-based royalties, fixed fees, minimum guarantees, or milestone payments. The best approach balances incentivizing the licensee to promote the asset while ensuring the licensor receives fair compensation; it should also include audit rights and clear reporting intervals to verify payments. Consider including a minimum annual payment where appropriate, escalation clauses tied to sales volume, and definitions for gross versus net sales. Also address currency, timing of payments, taxes, and remedies for underreporting to reduce disputes and provide predictable revenue streams for licensors.
Granting exclusive distribution rights typically means a single distributor has sole authority within a specified territory or channel. Granting exclusivity to multiple parties in the same territory would defeat the purpose of exclusivity and create conflicts. Carefully define exclusivity scope, including channels excluded or reserved for the licensor, to avoid ambiguity. If multiple parties are essential for market coverage, consider nonexclusive arrangements with performance metrics or carve-outs for specific channels. Include termination or performance-based review clauses so exclusivity can be revoked or modified if expectations are not met, preserving flexibility for the licensor.
Quality control provisions should set standards for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and marketing to protect brand reputation. Include approval rights for promotional materials, inspection rights for products, and remedies for noncompliance such as corrective action plans, suspension of rights, or termination where warranted. Also require compliance with applicable laws and industry standards, and outline procedures for addressing customer complaints and product recalls. Establishing clear quality requirements reduces the risk of consumer harm and strengthens the licensor’s ability to enforce standards and require corrective steps without resorting immediately to dispute resolution.
Protecting trade secrets in licensing arrangements requires precise confidentiality clauses, limited disclosure, and restrictions on reverse engineering. Agreements should clearly identify protected information, outline permitted uses, and require reasonable security measures. Consider including return or destruction obligations upon termination and specific remedies for misappropriation. Implement internal policies and training for employees and contractors who may access disclosed information, and use noncompete or non-solicitation measures where enforceable. Combine contractual protections with operational safeguards to reduce the risk of inadvertent disclosure and strengthen your position if enforcement becomes necessary.
Termination provisions should address convenience termination, breach-based termination, and termination for insolvency or force majeure events. Define cure periods for breaches, consequences for termination such as return of materials or inventory disposition, and the handling of outstanding payments and ongoing obligations to customers. Also include transition assistance and winding-down obligations to protect customer relationships and continuity of service. Clear post-termination restrictions on IP use, marketing, and contact with customers help prevent immediate reputational damage and preserve value while parties implement an orderly separation.
Cross-border distribution requires clauses that address choice of law, dispute resolution, import/export compliance, currency and tax considerations, and allocation of customs responsibilities. Explicitly allocate responsibility for duties, clearances, and local registrations to prevent operational surprises and financial exposure when goods cross borders. Consider local regulatory approvals for products, language requirements for documentation, and strategies for handling differing liability regimes. Tailor contract terms to reflect the jurisdictions involved and coordinate with local counsel or advisors where necessary to ensure compliance with applicable laws and enforcement mechanisms.
Monitoring compliance requires clear reporting obligations, periodic audits, and defined records that the distributor or licensee must maintain. Include audit rights with reasonable notice and confidentiality protections, and establish reporting formats and intervals to facilitate verification of royalties, sales data, and other performance metrics. Use contractual remedies for noncompliance, including interest on late payments, repeat reporting, and termination rights for persistent breaches. Combining audits with proactive communication channels and performance reviews helps detect issues early and keeps partners aligned with contractual expectations.
Mediation and arbitration clauses can provide faster, confidential, and cost-effective paths to resolve disputes compared with litigation. Mediation encourages negotiated settlements, while arbitration offers binding decisions outside court systems. Selecting the appropriate mechanism depends on the desire for confidentiality, speed, and the enforceability of awards in relevant jurisdictions. Ensure dispute resolution clauses specify the governing rules, seat, and language of proceedings, and tailor processes for emergency relief or interim measures when IP misuse or urgent enforcement is a concern. Clear clauses reduce procedural uncertainty and promote practical paths to resolve conflicts without prolonged interruption to business operations.
To enforce agreements against a nonperforming partner, first document breaches and pursue negotiated remedies such as cure plans or financial reconciliation. If negotiation fails, pursue contractual remedies including damages, injunctive relief to stop IP misuse, or enforcement through arbitration or litigation depending on the dispute resolution clause. Maintain thorough records of performance and communications to support enforcement. Consider interim relief where irreparable harm exists, and weigh commercial outcomes against litigation costs. Where possible, pursue remedies that restore business continuity, such as appointing alternate distributors or securing provisional orders to prevent further harm.
